These are general comments for the paper summary. A - minor errors B - major error or many minor errors C - major and minor errors F - fail Explain terminology e.g. "amplitudes are whitened" e.g. "the semiperiodic DNA sequences are considered that are neither periodic nor nonperiodic." Summary without explanation e.g. "Results show that similar quality was achieved" How? Need to cite where figures come from Impcomplete reference e.g., no volume or number for an article. Put math in math mode, and consider putting equations on a line by themselves. Not including the paper you summarized in the references. Not including the original paper. Get the citation style correct. [Ji07] or [1] is fine, but [Ji et al. 2007] is weird. ``Ji, et al., ... [1]'' would also be good. Spell out acronyms Use a different font for computer code. Put journal names in italics. Wikipedia is not appropriate for college-level work. Make sure the equations are legible (are you scanning them in ?) Include a little information about the assignment - your name, the date, the assignment, the class. Don't say "the author" because this is confusing. Cite the source within your summary. Do you agree with what the paper says? Do you disagree? What could they have done better? Go deeper into the original paper than just a superficial level. For example, try to explain some of the math behind it. There's no need to split the work into several sub-headings. The writing should flow. Here is a list of common problems (Fall 2021) --------------------------------------------- only minor problems (can be lack of proof-reading, reference style, etc.) minor problems, poor focus minor problems, not clear needs to explain uncommon terms minor problems, too many refs needs to explain more needs to explain uncommon terms, not clear text of a caption without citing pasted a sentence directly, did not indicate (though cited) needs to explain uncommon terms, review needs depth conf paper needs to quote!! need to quote copied text. You must cite your sources!